Peec AI Visibility Metrics Review

Peec AI's visibility metrics span six AI engines and include domain-level + URL-level breakdowns. This review compares its metrics depth to Profound, Bluefish, and Brandlight.

Visibility Metrics Overview

Peec AI tracks share of voice, citation frequency, sentiment, and competitor presence across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Mode, and AI Overviews. Metrics are exposed natively in-app and via a Google Looker Studio connector.

Metrics Covered

Available Metrics

  • • Share of voice across 6 engines
  • • Citation frequency (used vs cited)
  • • Sentiment (positive / neutral / negative)
  • • Source URL frequency
  • • Regional visibility breakdowns
  • • Competitor benchmarking

Gaps

  • • No Claude coverage
  • • Sentiment is 3-class (no topic-level breakdown)
  • • Country count tied to plan tier
  • • Prompt caps: 25 / 100 / 300+ by tier

Visibility Metrics Comparison

MetricPeec AIProfoundBluefishAiso
Engines Covered64 (Enterprise)45
Sentiment Classes3-class3-class5-class5-class + topics
Source AttributionUsed + citedDomain-levelSource-type breakdownPer-prompt + page
Looker Studio IntegrationYesVia exportVia APIYes
Prompt Cap (entry tier)25LimitedQuote-basedCustom

Use Cases & Recommendations

Best For

  • • Teams already on Looker Studio for marketing dashboards
  • • Brands tracking Google AI Mode and AI Overviews specifically
  • • SMB and mid-market budgets ($89–$199/mo)

Consider Alternatives For

  • • Claude monitoring (not supported)
  • • Topic-level sentiment classification
  • • High-volume prompt sets without per-tier caps
  • • Real ChatGPT conversation data (not just brand mentions)

Want metrics across every major AI engine?

Aiso reports daily share of voice, sentiment, and source attribution across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude — without prompt caps.

See the Most Accurate AI Visibility Metrics

Related Reviews

→ Peec AI Citation Analysis→ Alternative to Peec AI→ Profound Visibility Metrics